Zach Montague

A three-judge panel appeared unconvinced by claims that a federal law requiring the president to preserve and hand over his presidential papers was unconstitutional.

During a four-hour hearing, a federal judge demanded answers from the Trump administration about who authorized the removal of hundreds of trees at the East Potomac Golf Links.

The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to deploy a system that merges personal data from across the government. Questions remain about its reliability.

The public is not allowed inside but some staff members continued to report to work after officials temporarily closed the main building, citing hazardous conditions.

A federal judge told center officials at a hearing that he would not approve a plan to inscribe President Trump’s name on the building.

The ruling delivered another blow to the plan with a looming Supreme Court decision that could determine whether it goes into effect before the midterm election.

A federal appeals court panel declined to let Homeland Security reopen access to a voter-screening tool that incorporated Social Security data.

The ruling arrived before the Supreme Court could decide whether to intervene but appeared certain to set off yet another round of appeals.

Judge Indira Talwani said the Postal Service appeared to be trying a haphazard “experiment” with a new rule that could result in valid ballots being tossed.

The ruling raised concerns that babies already defined as citizens by the Supreme Court could have their citizenship revoked under an order the president signed in August.

The Supreme Court gave a green light to the new White House ballroom, but several of the president’s other Washington projects remain stalled.

For years, conservative litigants flocked to Judge Reed O’Connor’s district. Now, North Texas has become a favorite destination of the Justice Department.

After reviewing the agency’s final plan to comply with President Trump’s demands, a federal judge barred the Postal Service from imposing new restrictions on mail-in voting.

After the court forced the removal of the president’s name from the building’s title, the center devised a plan to add an inscription honoring President Trump.

The order came amid a spate of legal challenges, including one by Democratic state attorneys general, that could still result in the rules being blocked.

A federal appeals court panel backed a lower court’s ruling, and made it likely that the Supreme Court will decide the case. But the decision does not mean construction will halt immediately.